Readability

Paste any text to instantly see Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG scores alongside the grade level each algorithm targets — so you can tune copy for your audience.

Flesch Reading Ease

0 Hard100 Easy
FK Gradeneeds text
Gunning Fogneeds text
SMOGneeds text
Coleman-Liauneeds text
ARIneeds text
Text Stats

Words

Sentences

Syllables

Complex words

Avg words / sentence

Avg syllables / word

Why use our online Readability?

Measure how easy your content is to read using Flesch-Kincaid and other established readability formulas. Paste any text and get a grade level and score instantly — no account needed.

How to use Readability

  1. 1
    Paste or type your text

    Click the text area and paste the content you want to analyse — a blog post, landing page copy, email, or any prose. The scores update in real time as you type.

  2. 2
    Read the Flesch Reading Ease score

    The top card shows a score from 0 to 100. Higher is easier: 70+ is suitable for a general web audience, 60–69 is standard, and below 50 signals text that will challenge most readers.

  3. 3
    Check the grade-level scores

    Flesch-Kincaid Grade, Gunning Fog, and SMOG each estimate the US school grade a reader needs to comfortably understand the text. Aim for grade 6–9 for most online content.

  4. 4
    Use the stats to identify what to fix

    The stats row shows average words per sentence and syllables per word — the two main drivers of all the scores. Long sentences and polysyllabic words push grade level up; shortening them brings it down.

  5. 5
    Revise and re-check

    Edit directly in the text area and watch the scores respond instantly. When the numbers land in the range for your target audience, your copy is ready.

How the Flesch Reading Ease score is calculated

The Flesch Reading Ease formula, developed by Rudolf Flesch in 1948, produces a score between 0 and 100: RE = 206.835 − (1.015 × average words per sentence) − (84.6 × average syllables per word). The two drivers are sentence length and syllable count. Longer sentences and more polysyllabic words push the score down (harder to read); shorter sentences and simpler words push it up.

The scoring ranges are practical landmarks. 90–100: very easy (Simple English, children's books). 70–80: easy (plain English, suitable for general consumer audiences). 60–70: standard (plain writing, appropriate for most web content). 50–60: fairly difficult (high school level). 30–50: difficult (college level, academic writing). 0–30: very difficult (professional or technical writing, legal documents).

For most online content — websites, email newsletters, product pages, help articles — aim for 60–70. Marketing copy often targets 70+. Journalism traditionally targets 65–70 (the "newspaper standard"). Academic papers routinely fall below 30, which is appropriate for their audience but would drive away general readers.

Gunning Fog and SMOG — which score to trust for your content

The Gunning Fog Index was developed by Robert Gunning in 1952 for newspaper publishers who wanted to ensure their content reached a broad audience. The formula: Grade = 0.4 × (average words per sentence + percentage of words with 3+ syllables). It targets US school grade level — a score of 8 means an 8th-grade reading level (13–14 year olds).

SMOG (Simple Measure of Gobbledygook) was developed by G. Harry McLaughlin in 1969 and is calibrated specifically on reading comprehension — not just decoding ability. Research suggests it is the most accurate predictor of whether readers actually understand content, especially in health and medical contexts. The US CDC and many health agencies use SMOG as their primary readability measure because health literacy is lower than reading ability; patients can decode words they don't comprehend.

For general web content, Flesch Reading Ease is the most commonly reported score. For health, medical, or public health content where true comprehension matters, SMOG is more appropriate. Gunning Fog is a good middle ground that weights both sentence length and complex vocabulary.

Practical tips for improving your readability score

The two biggest levers are sentence length and word choice. Most readability formulas weight these roughly equally.

For sentences: aim for an average of 15–20 words per sentence for online content. Sentences over 30 words are almost always improvable by splitting at a conjunction or semicolon. Vary length — too many identical-length sentences feel monotonous. Short sentences (under 10 words) create emphasis; use them after complex sentences.

For word choice: prefer a shorter, everyday word over a longer, technical one when both are accurate. "Use" instead of "utilise". "Help" instead of "facilitate". "End" instead of "terminate". "Show" instead of "demonstrate". This is not dumbing down — it is respecting the reader's time. Technical jargon is fine when writing for a specialist audience that shares vocabulary; define terms on first use when writing for a general audience.

For structure: active voice keeps sentences shorter and clearer than passive voice. "The system processed your request" (6 words) vs "Your request was processed by the system" (7 words, and the agent is buried at the end). Bullet points and subheadings break up long blocks of prose and let readers scan — which is how most people read online.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Flesch Reading Ease and what score should I aim for?

The Flesch Reading Ease formula produces a score from 0 to 100. Scores of 70–80 are considered easy and suitable for a general consumer audience (roughly grade 6–7). Marketing copy and web content typically targets 60–70. Academic or legal text often falls below 30.

What is the difference between Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and SMOG?

All three estimate the US school-grade level a reader needs to understand the text, but they weight sentence length and word complexity differently. Flesch-Kincaid uses average syllables per word. Gunning Fog focuses on the proportion of 'complex' words (3+ syllables). SMOG counts polysyllabic words and is considered the most accurate predictor of reading comprehension, especially for health and medical writing.

Why is SMOG less reliable for short texts?

The SMOG formula was originally calibrated on samples of exactly 30 sentences. With fewer sentences, the estimate becomes less statistically stable. The tool computes it regardless and flags when the text is under 30 sentences so you can interpret the number with appropriate caution.

What are Coleman-Liau and ARI?

Coleman-Liau and the Automated Readability Index (ARI) are grade-level formulas that use character counts instead of syllable counts, making them faster to compute and immune to syllable-counting errors. They are particularly useful as a cross-check against the syllable-based scores.

Does the Readability Checker store my text?

No. All analysis runs in your browser using JavaScript. Your text is never sent to any server. The session is saved in your browser's local storage so you can return to your work, and cleared whenever you clear the text area.

Related Tools