20% Down vs 5% Down: Which Down Payment Strategy Wins?
Home Price
$500K
Monthly Rent
$2,200
Down Payment (20%)
$100K
Est. Break-Even
5 yrs
The 20% down vs 5% down question is really about opportunity cost. With 20% down on a $500K home, you put $100,000 in illiquid home equity. With 5% down ($25,000), you keep $75,000 liquid — but pay PMI (~$208/month on $475K loan) and have a higher mortgage payment.
The 5% down buyer pays ~$3,260/month (higher loan, plus PMI) vs ~$2,620/month with 20% down — a $640/month difference. If that $75,000 saved earns 7%/year in stocks, it grows to $147,000 in 10 years. Meanwhile, PMI costs $208/month until you hit 20% equity (roughly year 7 on normal amortization + 3.5% appreciation) — totaling ~$17,500 in PMI payments.
Net result: keeping $75,000 invested generates ~$72,000 more than PMI costs over 10 years ($147K growth - $75K principal - $17.5K PMI = ~$54K net advantage for 5% down). However, the 20% down buyer also invests any monthly payment difference — so the comparison is close. The 5% down path wins mathematically if you invest the saved down payment.
The non-financial factors matter too: 20% down gives you a lower monthly payment (easier cash flow), no PMI, stronger offers in competitive markets, and lower interest rate (typically). 5% down preserves liquidity for emergencies. Most financial planners suggest 20% down if you have it — not because it's mathematically optimal, but because it reduces risk and monthly stress.